Does It Make What You're Saying More Important?

Tautology is saying the same thing twice. We don’t often realise we are doing it, but we commonly emphasise a word by adding another word with the same meaning either in front or after the word we are using. 

Common examples are:

  • Past history 

  • Near future

  • Completely finished

  • False illusion

  • New innovations

  • 8am in the morning

  • Foreign import

  • True facts

 If you pull the words apart, you see how the words are different yet say the same thing or that common sense says you don’t really need both words!

 

Example: 

Past history – history refers to the past and the past is history so there is no need to use both words. You could use either as: 

History tells us ….

OR 

In the past …

Tautology doesn’t make what we’re saying more important, we’re just using more words to say what we mean. By eliminating tautology, we can make our writing clear and concise.

Are they any examples of tautology that you commonly use?

 

Who or Whom?

The use of WHOM is considered a very formal word and is now generally replaced with WHO. WHO is the subjective form while WHOM is the objective form. 

Who (subjective: person doing the action) will mow the grass? 

Whom (objective: person receiving the action) did they pay to do the job? 

The use of WHOM in standard writing is limited to sentences where WHOM follows a proposition. 

The managers to whom you spoke are at the meeting.

Where there is no proposition WHOM can be deleted. 

The following sentence shows how it reads with whom included, then we have re-written the sentence to exclude whom. 

The workers whom the manager met are all going on strike.

The workers the manager met are all going on strike.

As you can see whom becomes unnecessary.